When Maurice Stebila’s CEO emailed him at midnight, requesting if he knew about the latest headline-grabbing cyber event, it cemented his ideas to start creating weekly reports which would help his organization grab what’s happening in the world of cybersecurity. Cyberthreat confirming can be a strong tool that helps the table and leadership better figure out security good posture so they can help to make informed decisions about risk mitigation.
But how should CISOs make robust, easily-understood cybersecurity information that promote data-driven interaction among boards, executives, and security and risk clubs? Ultimately, it’s about making sure the best information gets to the suitable people in the right time.
To perform that, is considered important to remember the group when creating a cyber risk report. CISOs should consider that will receive the article, as well as whether that person offers any specialized training. They have to also make sure that this hyperlink the report contains only relevant and important information, since presenting too much data may overwhelm and confuse someone.
Another task is preventing bias in a cyber danger report, simply because the article writer is inevitably judging the client’s processes and policies. This is certainly overcome simply by diligent paperwork of conclusions, including obvious explanations and referencing industry-recognized standards with respect to vulnerabilities, such as Prevalent Weakness Enumerations (CWEs) and Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs). In this way, the writer elevates themselves from merely a cataloguer of flaws into a professional who all enables their particular clients to identify true risk. And, in case the writer exercises tact and respect, they will most likely preserve positive associations with their customers which could lead to further contract job.